Cases 111 - 120 of 854
Lane et al v. Security National Mortgage Company et al
as 2:2022cv00565
Plaintiff:
Marvin Lane and Shanita Lane
Defendant:
Security National Mortgage Company, Tamara Perrin and Lisa Casanova
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv02014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Moore v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00977
Plaintiff:
David Lee Moore and Tugaya Shabaka
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Corporation Partner and Parent Company Centurion, Ricky D. Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21494
Plaintiff:
LANE BOYT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LANE v. PISTROL
as 5:2022cv00189
Petitioner:
ANTHONY JAMES LANE
Respondent:
KEVIN PISTROL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nelson v. Major et al
as 8:2022cv02409
Plaintiff:
Ross Lane Nelson
Defendant:
Robert L. Major and Major Site Development, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
LANE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20834
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK LANE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. Gunther et al
as 5:2022cv00366
Petitioner:
Rodolfo Martinez Rodriguez
Defendant:
FNU Gunther, Michael Carvajal, C Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Himes v. St Petersburg Kennel Club Inc
as 8:2022cv02077
Plaintiff:
James Himes
Defendant:
St Petersburg Kennel Club Inc a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as Derby Lane
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
LANE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19869
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER J LANE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
