Cases 111 - 120 of 255
Taberski et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00867
Plaintiff:
Tracie Lynn Taberski and Walter Alexander Taberski, Jr.
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Paynter et al v. Macy's West Stores Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00735
Plaintiff:
Sue Paynter and Walter Paynter
Defendant:
Macy's West Stores Incorporated and Arrowhead Towne Center LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Solomon v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00680
Plaintiff:
Walter Solomon
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox v. Agnew et al
as 2:2017cv00596
Petitioner:
Walter John Cox, Jr.
Respondent:
Carla Hacker Agnew and Arizona Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spriggs et al v. Rector et al
as 2:2017mc00005
Plaintiff:
Everett Spriggs and Betty Spriggs
Defendant:
Walter Rector, WWR Holdings LLC, Bromont Investments Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Goedecke #080048 v. Taylor et al
as 2:2017cv00162
Plaintiff:
Walter C Goedecke
Defendant:
Tammy L Taylor and Corizon Health Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nohr v. Jang et al
as 2:2017mc00002
Plaintiff:
Jason L Nohr
Defendant:
Corinna Jang, Chris Litsey, Patrick Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Van v. Ryan et al
as 4:2017cv00010
Plaintiff:
Walter J Van, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Party, Unknown Samples and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Southwest Distributing Company v. Demilec (USA) Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv04504
Plaintiff:
Southwest Distributing Company
Defendant:
Demilec (USA) Incorporated and Walter Robert Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Goedecke #080048 v. Moony
as 2:2016cv04454
Plaintiff:
Walter C Goedecke
Defendant:
Unknown Moony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
