Cases 111 - 120 of 526
Phillips et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv14508
Plaintiff:
Grace Ellen Phillips and Autry Phillips
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. Phillips
as 1:2015cv00192
Plaintiff:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Defendant:
Robert L. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv14268
Plaintiff:
Donna Phillips
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Tissue Science Laboratories Limited , Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rupp et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv14165
Plaintiff:
Erika Rupp and Phillip Rupp
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS, Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00112
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Phillips v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv13313
Plaintiff:
Sheila Phillips
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2015cv13172
Plaintiff:
Julie Phillips and John Phillips
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beasley et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2015cv12807
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Beasley and Phillip Beasley
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caldwell et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12810
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Caldwell and Phillip Caldwell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Erke et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv12615
Plaintiff:
Carla Erke and Phillip R. Erke
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Biotech, Inc., Cook Medical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
