Cases 111 - 120 of 49,938
KORMAN 1830 LOMBARD, LLC v. ARBS PEPPER LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01582
Plaintiff:
KORMAN 1830 LOMBARD, LLC
Defendant:
ARBS PEPPER LLC and 1830 LOMBARD JOINT VENTURE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
READING COLLISION CENTER v. GONZALEZ
as 5:2024cv01576
Plaintiff:
READING COLLISION CENTER
Defendant:
SANDRA GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
JAMES MADOSKY
as 1:2024cv04933
Petitioner:
JAMES MADOSKY
Claimant:
ESTATE OF NORMA MICHAELS
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0185 PETITION FOR LIMITATION LIABILITY
FERDINAND v. LITHIA RAMSEY-B LLC
as 2:2024cv04956
Plaintiff:
EMMAUS FERDINAND
Defendant:
LITHIA RAMSEY-B LLC d.b.a. BMW OF RAMSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
HALL v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv01543
Plaintiff:
ALTORO HALL
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
MARQUETTE v. INDEPENDENCE BLUE CROSS
as 2:2024cv01546
Plaintiff:
RYAN MARQUETTE
Defendant:
INDEPENDENCE BLUE CROSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Diaz v. EMPIRE FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv01549
Plaintiff:
Bismary Diaz
Defendant:
EMPIRE FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, TERRELL JOHNSON and Sixt Rent A Car, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
ARSENAL LANES INC et al v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv01544
Plaintiff:
ARSENAL LANES INC and PAUL BUNCHER
Defendant:
AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. ELITE TRANSIT SOLUTIONS, LLC
as 2:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association d/b/a U.S. Bank Equipment Finance
Defendant:
ELITE TRANSIT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
