Cases 111 - 120 of 8,488
Courtemanche et al v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv40030
Plaintiff:
Jason Courtemanche, Brett Foresman, Juan Rios and others
Defendant:
Motorola Solutions, Inc., Colonel John E Mawn, Jr, Callyo 2009 Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DiGregorio v. Otis et al
as 1:2024cv10422
Plaintiff:
Nicholas DiGregorio
Defendant:
Robert Otis, Wilson Alves, Brockton Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Reilly v. Town of Lexington et al
as 1:2024cv10415
Plaintiff:
Carol Reilly
Defendant:
Town of Lexington, Officer Steve Papia, Officer Joseph Carruthers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kersey v. Republican National Committee
as 1:2024cv10387
Plaintiff:
George Kersey
Defendant:
Republican National Committee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Porter Jr v. Commonwealth Superior Court's Division's et al
as 4:2024cv40028
Plaintiff:
Richard W Porter Jr
Defendant:
Commonwealth Superior Court's Division's, Worcester Superior Court and Essex Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Harding v. Meet Up.com et al
as 1:2024cv10382
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harding
Defendant:
Meet Up.com and David Siegel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
