Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 111 - 120 of 6,131
Dineen Etienne v. Machelle Sanders
as 24-1044
Plaintiff: DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant: MACHELLE SANDERS, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Administration; North Carolina Department of Commerce, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL, Division Executive Director, Historically Underutilized Businesses, BENNY SLOAN, DBW Certification Officer, North Carolina Department of Transportation and others
Jianyi Zhang v. FDA
as 24-1131
Plaintiff: JIANYI ZHANG
Defendant: UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Yassir Abdalla v. Prince William County Department of Transportation
as 24-1112
Plaintiff: YASSIR ABDALLA
Defendant: PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1094
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Marcus Adams v. City of Norfolk
as 24-6011
Plaintiff: MARCUS E. ADAMS
Defendant: THE CITY OF NORFOLK, ROBERT FORD, officially and individually, BRENT ARTHUR JOHNSON, officially and individually and others
Pearl Madrial v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1055
Plaintiff: PEARL O. MADRIAL
Defendant: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Cenk Uygur v. South Carolina Democratic Party
as 24-1052
Plaintiff: CENK UYGUR and JOHN WARD
Defendant: SOUTH CAROLINA, HENRY MCMASTER, in his official capacity as Governor of South Carolina, ALAN WILSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Carolina and others
William Jones v. Carlos Del Toro
as 24-1066
Plaintiff: WILLIAM DAVID JONES
Defendant: CARLOS DEL TORO, Secretary of the Navy
Matthew Jones v. Virginia State Police
as 24-1140
Plaintiff: MATTHEW JONES
Defendant: VIRGINIA STATE POLICE and NEWPORT NEWS POLICE
Tony Forrester v. Barbara Lacina
as 24-1114
Plaintiff: TONY GENE FORRESTER
Defendant: BARBARA LACINA, VICTORIA ANN LATHAM and TEARA S. DARGAN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?