Cases 111 - 120 of 12,476
Desmarais v. Washington State DOC et al
as 1:2024cv03011
Plaintiff:
John Michael Desmarais
Defendant:
Washington State DOC, Klickitat County Sheriffs Office, Gillaim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reevis v. Spokane County Superior Court et al
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
Spokane County Detention Services Napacare, Eastern State Hospital, Spokane County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDaniel v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05223
Petitioner:
Dennis McDaniel
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garvie v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00371
Petitioner:
Eugene Brian Garvie
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hart v. Jackson et al
as 4:2024cv05031
Plaintiff:
Jason Mark Hart
Defendant:
Rob Jackson, Robin Smith, Lamin Sennah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Warner
as 2:2024cv00242
Petitioner:
Diondrae Brown
Respondent:
Jack Warner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Bennett
as 1:2024cv03009
Petitioner:
Edward Nelson
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Felder v. Ahern
as 2:2024cv00381
Petitioner:
Marcus Dieter Felder
Respondent:
Gregory J. Ahern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Alexander v. Jackson
as 2:2024cv00354
Petitioner:
Kevion Maurice Alexander
Respondent:
Rob Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holland v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00370
Petitioner:
Demeko Brazille Holland
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
