Cases 111 - 120 of 122,721
(PS) Malik v. Wright et al
as 2:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
Ghaus Malik
Defendant:
Robert W Wright, Walid Tamari, Margaret E. White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Mitchell v. CA Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2024cv00522
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Superior Court, County of Nevada
as 2:2024cv01247
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Superior Court, County of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Superior Court of Placer County
as 2:2024cv01244
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Superior Court of Placer County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rubio v. Aaron's LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00526
Plaintiff:
Angel Rubio
Defendant:
Aaron's LLC and Quintin Lake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Brown v. Newsom et al
as 2:2024cv01281
Plaintiff:
William Brown
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Jeff Macomber, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024at00555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Edwards v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 2:2024at00554
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Edwards
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Smith v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Assoc.
as 2:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
Jared Smith
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
