Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California
Cases 111 - 120 of 26,383
Hill v. Mann et al
as 4:2024cv02578
Plaintiff: Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant: Dr. Mann, Fennie Clay and Dr. Sabfive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Medical Staff from Program 1 et al
as 4:2024cv02579
Plaintiff: Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant: Medical Staff from Program 1, Monique and Jenny Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradford v. Martinez Coke Cola Refinery
as 4:2024cv01444
Plaintiff: Donald Dante Bradford
Defendant: Martinez Coke Cola Refinery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gerate v. Lavigtan
as 3:2024cv01666
Petitioner: Maria Del Carmen Gerate
Respondent: Lavigtan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaines v. City Of Oakland
as 1:2024cv02515
Plaintiff: Jacobi Gaines
Defendant: City Of Oakland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. PT Abie
as 4:2024cv02545
Plaintiff: Cymeyon Hill
Defendant: Medical Staff PT Abie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DePonte v. Bowman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv01414
Plaintiff: David Arthur DePonte
Defendant: Jessica Bowman and Daniel Queava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Newsom et al
as 5:2024cv01415
Plaintiff: Artero Collins
Defendant: Gavin Newsom, Jeff Macomber, Steven Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01643
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Anderson
as 3:2024cv01295
Petitioner: Carlos Hernandez
Respondent: Ryan Anderson
Defendant: Warden Steve Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?