Cases 111 - 120 of 1,402
McNichols v. Armark Corp. et al
as 0:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond McNichols
Defendant:
Armark Corp., Theresa Gullett and Adam Bare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Mills et al
as 3:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Shileka P. Hill
Defendant:
Shift Command Mills, Officer Quinnett, Officer Mondeli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephenson v. Daniels et al
as 3:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Brison Stephenson
Defendant:
Aaron Daniels, Jailer Darrell Cox, Deputy Robert Gravett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Branham et al
as 7:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Heath Anthony Baker, Ashley, Anthony Heath Baker and others
Defendant:
Christy Branham, Kentucky Parole Board, Cookie Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goods v. Daley et al
as 2:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Defendant:
Jailer James A. Daley, Lt. Hoyer, Maj. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Mock
as 5:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dawson
Defendant:
Delsa Mock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Couch v. Clay County Detention Center et al
as 6:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Couch
Defendant:
Clay County Detention Center, Linda Smallwood, Michael Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. BOP
as 6:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Rafael D Foster
Defendant:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Couch v. Clay County Detention Center et al
as 6:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Couch
Defendant:
Clay County Detention Center and Linda Smallwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shannon et al v. Burberry et al
as 5:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Mark Shannon, Jeff Tucker, William Peters and others
Defendant:
West Burberry and Bourbon County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
