Cases 111 - 120 of 27,962
Barnett v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00439
Petitioner:
Christopher J Barnett
Respondent:
Cynthia Smith, Carrie Bridges and John Masquelier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coomes v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Colin Coomes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Holz v. LNU et al
as 5:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Holz
Defendant:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
United States of America et al v. Joint Technology, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Reynaldo Solano, California State Of and others
Defendant:
Joint Technology Inc doing business as Revert Systems, Jim Patton, Dr. John Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Harris v. US Government Wide
as 5:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
Latoya S Harris
Defendant:
US Government Wide
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Runnels v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Savortae Runnels
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, Emily Timms, FNU Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leach v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00433
Petitioner:
Nicholas J Leach
Respondent:
Cynthia Smith, Carrie Bridges and John Masquelier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Mars et al
as 5:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jenifer Mars, City of Lawton doing business as Lawton Animal Welfare and Lawton Humane Society and Animal Shelter Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Pursuant to the Family Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
