Cases 111 - 120 of 17,730
Cave v. Dauphin County Prison
as 1:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Cave
Defendant:
Dauphin County Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conklin IV v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Conklin IV
Defendant:
John Doe and Carbon County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Linarez v. Garland et al
as 3:2024cv00488
Petitioner:
Luis Emilio Cordin Linarez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Patrick J. Lechleitner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cooper v. Prince et al
as 4:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Bruce X. Cooper
Defendant:
Scott Prince and Mark Abel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2024cv00491
Petitioner:
Daryl Williams
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Jessica Sage and BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Townsend v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Lee Townsend
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Vargas v. Pierre et al
as 3:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Edwin F. Vargas
Defendant:
Lionel Pierre, Roger Lucas, Jill Cuffaro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. Wertz et al
as 1:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Bobby Kenneth Williamson
Defendant:
R. Wertz, C. Banks, R. Kyler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cicchiello v. Warden Briggs et al
as 3:2024cv00475
Petitioner:
Joan Cicchiello
Respondent:
Warden Briggs and Pennsylvania Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Arviza
as 3:2024cv00477
Petitioner:
James O. Anderson
Respondent:
Warden Arviza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
