Cases 111 - 120 of 705
Ryan and Rose, LLC v. Quintessential Tots, LLC
as 2:2020cv02149
Plaintiff:
Ryan and Rose, LLC
Defendant:
Quintessential Tots, LLC d/b/a Itzy Ritzy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
John R. Cash Revocable Trust v. Cash Brewing Company Inc.
as 3:2020cv00160
Defendant:
Cash Brewing Company Inc.
Plaintiff:
John R. Cash Revocable Trust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
DayCab Company, Inc. v. Prairie Technology, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00063
Defendant:
Big Truck Parts, LLC and Prairie Technology, LLC
Plaintiff:
DayCab Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
David Michael, Inc. v. Spencer et al
as 3:2019cv01126
Defendant:
West Tennessee Pain Specialists, PLLC, Charles Spencer and Roy Schmidt, M.D.
Plaintiff:
David Michael, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. M&D Market Corp. et al
as 3:2019cv01145
Defendant:
M&D Market Corp. and Mayank Patel
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Prohibition Distillery LLC v. Bootleggers LLC
as 3:2020cv00071
Defendant:
Bootleggers LLC
Plaintiff:
Prohibition Distillery LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Chattanooga Professional Soccer Management, LLC v. Arkansas State University
as 1:2019cv00339
Defendant:
Arkansas State University
Plaintiff:
Chattanooga Professional Soccer Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Saidak v. Schmidt
as 3:2019cv00487
Defendant:
Michael Schmidt and Trumpet of the Lord
Plaintiff:
Derek Saidak
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Spyderco, Inc. v. Classic Blades and Gifts et al (TV2)
as 3:2019cv00413
Defendant:
Irina Khan and Classic Blades and Gifts
Plaintiff:
Spyderco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Vest et al v. Nixon et al
as 3:2019cv00499
Defendant:
Virgil Ryan Belcher, Shad Teems, Kenneth Nixon and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Vest and Brandon Wooten
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
