Cases 111 - 120 of 2,585
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv01267
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv01276
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanford v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv01366
Plaintiff:
James R. Sanford, III
Defendant:
Governor Bill Lee, David B. Rausch, Frank Strada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv01297
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caldwell, Sr. v. Roberts et al
as 3:2023cv01112
Plaintiff:
Dr. Keith R. Caldwell, Sr.
Defendant:
John Roberts, William H. Pryor, Jr., Mary S. Scriven and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Tennessee Equality Project Foundation, Inc. v. The City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv01044
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Equality Project Foundation, Inc.
Defendant:
The City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee, The City Council of Murfreesboro, Tennessee, Shane McFarland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cocchini v. The City of Franklin,Tennessee
as 3:2023cv01185
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cocchini
Defendant:
The City of Franklin,Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. Lo et al
as 3:2023cv01148
Plaintiff:
Linda Allen
Defendant:
Joshua D. Lo, Reese Harper, James Hambrick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Doe v. Lee et al
as 2:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powell v. City of La Vergne, Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv01320
Plaintiff:
Lewis Powell
Defendant:
City of La Vergne, Tennessee, Mayor Jason Cole, Andrew Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
