Cases 111 - 120 of 140,615
Trull v. Mag Mutual Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Devan Trull
Defendant:
Mag Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
United States of America v. Alexis
as 5:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Isaac Gabriel Alexis
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Brown v. Fayette County, West Virginia Prosecuting Attorney
as 2:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Robert I. Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Fayette County, West Virginia Prosecuting Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawson v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00027
Petitioner:
Javon Dawson
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Scritchfield v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Susan Marie Scritchfield
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Amgen, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Amgen, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Hanley v. Adkins
as 5:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Robert Hanley
Defendant:
Otha Ray Adkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Love v. Flowers et al
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dean Love
Defendant:
Brandon S. Flowers A.U.S.A., F.C.I Hazelton Warden Rey, F.C.I. Hazelton S.I.S. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Love v. Flowers et al
as 3:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Jerry Dean Love
Respondent:
A.U.S.A. Brandon S. Flowers and U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of West Virginia at Clarksburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
