Cases 111 - 120 of 12,089
TerVeer v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Justin TerVeer
Defendant:
Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Broomfield et al
as 3:2024cv00120
Petitioner:
Earnest Cassell Woods, II
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Guzman et al
as 3:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jafain Harris
Defendant:
Fidencio Guzman and Centinela State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Villalobos Navarro v. USA
as 3:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
Maria Josse Villalobos-Navarro
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Gonzalez Becerra v. ICE Officer et al
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Carlos Jonathan Gonzalez Becerra
Defendant:
ICE Officer, San Ysidro Detention Center, Otay Mesa Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00029
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kinsey v. Hill et al
as 3:2023cv02325
Petitioner:
Jonathan R. Kinsey
Defendant:
Attorney General of California
Respondent:
Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Emert v. The People of the State of California et al
as 3:2023cv02318
Petitioner:
Robert Emert
Respondent:
The People of the State of California and San Diego Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blake v. Moreno
as 3:2023cv02310
Plaintiff:
Tom Blake
Defendant:
N. Moreno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. Doctor Lu
as 3:2023cv02284
Plaintiff:
Claudie Tyler
Defendant:
Doctor Lu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
