Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Cases 111 - 120 of 51,627
Bender v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00654
Plaintiff: Sherry Bender
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Holmes v. Harry et al
as 4:2024cv00655
Petitioner: James Franklin Holmes
Respondent: Laurel Harry and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Munoz v. ACC Solutions, LLC
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff: Rosalba Munoz
Defendant: ACC Solutions, LLC doing business as ACC Medlink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
DePack, Jr. v. Green
as 1:2024cv00650
Petitioner: Roy John DePack, Jr.
Respondent: Warden J. Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shears v. Jenks et al
as 1:2024cv00645
Plaintiff: Daaron Shears
Defendant: Correctional Officer Jenks and Correctional Officer Marker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schaefer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00649
Plaintiff: Barbara A. Schaefer
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
State Farm & Casualty Co. v. DTB Services LLC
as 3:2024cv00642
Plaintiff: State Farm & Casualty Co.
Defendant: DTB Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00640
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Runkle v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00637
Plaintiff: Charles Runkle
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ervin (Trollinger) v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00638
Plaintiff: Letitia Ervin (Trollinger)
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?