Cases 121 - 130 of 215
ROHN v. JOHNSTON et al
as 2:2010cv01045
Plaintiff:
JAMOD KHAILIL ROHN
Defendant:
EDWARD 'EDDIE JOHNSTON, W. LEGGETT, M. SKOBEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANN v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv76031
Plaintiff:
WILLIE MANN
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Manns v. Bledsoe et al
as 1:2010cv01564
Plaintiff:
Tony Manns
Defendant:
B.A. Bledsoe and Pigos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHARLES v. CRAVIN et al
as 2:2010cv03242
Plaintiff:
KALINARDO VISHANTI CHARLES
Defendant:
JOSEPH CRAVIN, GREGORY MALLON, MARRY MANN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANN v. ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv68711
Plaintiff:
MAURICE C MANN
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY , A P GREEN REFRACTORIES CO , ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pittman v. Bledsoe et al
as 3:2010cv00748
Petitioner:
Darnell Pittman, Sr.
Respondent:
B.A. Bledsoe, F. Gambone, C. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pittman v. Bledsoe et al
as 3:2010cv00645
Petitioner:
Darnell Pittman, Sr.
Respondent:
B.A. Bledsoe, F. Gambone, C. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MANN V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv35807
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Plaintiff:
ROBERT F. MANN
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Crooker v. Popular Mortgage Servicing, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00356
Plaintiff:
Michael Alan Crooker
Defendant:
Popular Mortgage Servicing, Inc., First Federal Credit Control, JL Russell & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MANN v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33018
Plaintiff:
THOMAS D. MANN and THOMAS D. MANN
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
