Cases 121 - 130 of 964
Cone v. O'Daniel et al
as 1:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Timothy Cone
Defendant:
Patrick L O'Daniel, Derrelynn Perryman, Larry D. Miles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. O'Daniel et al
as 1:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Dannie Carter
Defendant:
Patrick L O'Daniel, Derrelynn Perryman, Larry D. Miles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pacheco-Morales v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00513
Petitioner:
Hector Pacheco-Morales
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv02036
Plaintiff:
Charlie Ray Taylor
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Ariel M. Burks, Curtis L. Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albarado v. Cozby et al
as 3:2023cv01252
Petitioner:
Juan Manuel Albarado
Respondent:
Jennifer Cozby, Bryan Collier and TDCJ - State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chatton v. Back et al
as 1:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Tommie Ray Chatton
Defendant:
J. Back, K. Smith, Adeola Bosede and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Evans v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv01997
Plaintiff:
Ishmael A. Evans
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Capt. Christopher Norsworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Barker v. O Ajaru et al
as 3:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
Don Barker
Defendant:
Peter Claver O Ajaru and Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. O Ajaru et al
as 4:2023cv01872
Plaintiff:
Don Barker
Defendant:
Peter Claver O Ajaru and Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
