Cases 121 - 130 of 212
GLENN v. WICKER et al
as 5:2020cv00017
Defendant:
MESSER, MEDICAL DIRECTOR MORRIS, OFFICER HAMEEM and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH GLENN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 5:2020cv00018
Plaintiff:
MARVIN SMITH
Defendant:
DIRECTOR RICK JACOBS, VICE CHAIRMAN BRIAN OWENS, CENTRAL STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00490
Plaintiff:
DARIUS D SMITH
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHIEF COUNSELOR PEW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOK v. JEFFERSON et al
as 5:2019cv00480
Defendant:
WARDEN TRACEY JEFFERSON, PSYCHOLOGIST STEVENSON, OFFICER PATRICK and others
Plaintiff:
MARCUS LOUIS COOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Illa et al
as 1:2019cv05423
Defendant:
Counselor James Jorges, Captain Gabriel Illa, Doctor Eugene and others
Plaintiff:
Devon Leo Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Illa et al
as 4:2019cv00292
Defendant:
Counselor James Jorges, Captain Gabriel Illa, Doctor Eugene and others
Plaintiff:
Devon Leo Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AIKEN v. PHILPIN et al
as 1:2019cv00191
Defendant:
Sgt. Perry, Sergeant Wilcox, DOCTOR WANTS and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Junior Aiken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNOWDEN v. DOE
as 1:2019cv00184
Respondent:
JOHN DOE
Petitioner:
STEVEN THOMAS SNOWDEN
Defendant:
JOHN I WALTON, KEITH DAY, LENA WREN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MALDONADO v. FORD et al
as 5:2019cv00421
Defendant:
CHIEF MAIL OFFICER BAUSHCUM, JPAY, LIEUTENANT GEORGE YAUSHN and others
Plaintiff:
PABLO F MALDONADO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COCHRAN v. MYRICK et al
as 1:2019cv00182
Defendant:
WARDEN DESIGNEE RUSSELL HOLLMAN, DEPUTY WARDEN NATHANIEL WILLIAMS, CO BELL and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO BERNARD COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
