Cases
Cases 121 - 127 of 127
MCLAURIN v. PITKINS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00050
Petitioner: SAUNDERS MCLAURIN
Respondent: D.W. PITKINS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOLLINGSWORTH v. SCI GREENE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00177
Petitioner: MARKUS JAMES HOLLINGSWORTH
Respondent: SCI GREENE and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
YOUNG v. COUNTY OF ERIE, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2009cv00261
Plaintiff: KIRK J. YOUNG
Defendant: COUNTY OF ERIE, PENNSYLVANIA, ERIE COUNTY OFFICE ERIE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, ERIE COUNTY ADULT PROBATION OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNES v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00151
Plaintiff: BENNIE E. BARNES
Defendant: COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE ERIE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MINDER v. LOCKETT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00214
Respondent: MELVIN LOCKETT, PA ATTORNEY GENERAL and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Petitioner: DONALD EARL MINDER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WORKMAN v. WARDEN, SCI GREENE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00146
Petitioner: ROBERT WORKMAN
Respondent: WARDEN, SCI GREENE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2007cv00116
Petitioner: VALERIE L. JONES
Respondent: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, CHIEF DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY, ERIE, PA and CHIEF CLERK OF COURTS-ERIE COUNTY, ERIE, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?