Cases 121 - 130 of 224
Young v. California Corrections Prisons Organization Association
as 3:2014cv01012
Plaintiff:
David Rowland Young
Defendant:
California Corrections Prisons Organization Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Unnamed Secretary
as 3:2014cv01013
Plaintiff:
David Rowland Young
Defendant:
Unnamed Secretary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Pennwell et al
as 3:2014cv01010
Plaintiff:
David Rowland Young
Defendant:
Sandra Pennwell, Amy Miller, David Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Young v. USA
as 14-11079
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID MARK YOUNG
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
David Rowland Young v. The United States of America
as 2:2014cv01528
Defendant:
The United States of America
Plaintiff:
David Rowland Young
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3013
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dolores Mandrigues, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
as 13-17234
:
In re: WACHOVIA CORP. "PICK-A-PAYMENT" MORTGAGE MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DOLORES MANDRIGUES, JUANITA JONES, AL F. MINYEN and others
Defendant - Appellant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, successor to by merger with Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, NA, FKA Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, FKA World Savings Bank, FSB
Real-party-in-interest - Appellee:
CHAN PHARN, CHRISTINA ZAKO, PAUL MCDERMED and others
YOUNG v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv01044
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. YOUNG
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY and SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND SAFETY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. USA
as 1:2013cv00351
Petitioner:
David M. Young
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
