Cases 121 - 130 of 156
Phillip Angel Senteno et al v. State of California et al
as 8:2008cv00366
Petitioner:
Phillip Angel Senteno
Respondent:
State of California, Derral Adams and SATF-State Prison@corcoran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frelimo v. Adams
as 3:2008cv01505
Petitioner:
Oba L. Frelimo
Respondent:
Derral Adams
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Frelimo v. Adams
as 1:2008cv00323
Petitioner:
Oba L. Frelimo
Respondent:
Derral Adams
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Freddie Lee Cromer v. Derral Adams
as 2:2008cv00653
Petitioner:
Freddie Lee Cromer
Respondent:
Derral Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Grant Gray v. Derral Adams, Warden
as 2:2008cv00445
Petitioner:
David G Gray
Respondent:
Derral Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Evie Parker v. San Bernardino County District Attorney's Central Priors Unit et al
as 5:2008cv00084
Petitioner:
James Evie Parker
Respondent:
San Bernardino County District Attorney's Central Priors Unit, Dennis Stout, SB Co Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gutierrez v. Adams
as 1:2007cv01874
Petitioner:
Michael Gutierrez
Respondent:
Derral Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parkin
as 1:2007at00630
Plaintiff:
James Louis Parkin, Jr.
Defendant:
James E. Tilton, DERRAL ADAMS, McGuiness and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Turner v. Adams
as 3:2007cv06258
Petitioner:
Edward L. Turner
Respondent:
Derral Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Casey v. Adams
as 1:2007cv01733
Petitioner:
Ruben Casey
Respondent:
Derral Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
