Cases 121 - 130 of 639
Davis et al v. Eli Lilly & Company et al
as 1:2016cv08124
Plaintiff:
Jesse Davis and Cristina Davis
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Company, Lilly USA, LLC, Acrux Commercial Pty Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Close v. Pfizer, Inc et al
as 3:2016cv04491
Plaintiff:
Armon Close
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc and Eli Lilly & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelly v. Pfizer et al
as 3:2016cv04493
Plaintiff:
William Kelly
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. and Eli Lilly & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ihle v. Pfizer, Inc et al
as 3:2016cv04458
Plaintiff:
Charles Ihle
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc and Eli Lilly & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02119
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hallman v. Eli Lilly & Company et al
as 1:2016cv07750
Plaintiff:
Paul Hallman
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Company, Acrux Commercial Pty Ltd and Acrux DDS PTY Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Buchanan v. Pfizer Inc., et al
as 3:2016cv04336
Plaintiff:
Arthur Buchanan
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc. and Eli Lilly & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Loyd v. AbbVie Inc et al
as 1:2016cv07573
Plaintiff:
Melanie Loyd
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc, Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hitchcock et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA Inc et al
as OKW/5:16-cv-00755
Plaintiff:
Carl Hitchcock , Donald E Herrold , Mary L Herrold and others
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Hitchcock et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA Inc et al
as 5:2016cv00755
Plaintiff:
Carl Hitchcock , Donald E Herrold , Mary L Herrold and others
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
