Cases 121 - 130 of 133
Armando Navar v. Warden Fort Dix FCI
as 13-4600
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARMANDO NAVAR
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
Pedro Olivier Diaz v. Warden Fort Dix FCI
as 13-4609
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEDRO A. OLIVEIR DIAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
Oscar Abelenda v. Warden Fort Dix FCI
as 13-4239
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSCAR ABELENDA
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DIRECTOR IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT AGENCY and others
Douglas Owens v. Abigail Lopez-De Lasalle, et al
as 13-3779
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS OWENS
Defendant - Appellee:
ABIGAIL LOPEZ-DE LASALLE, M.D. and WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
Frederick Banks v. Realty Counseling Company, et al
as 13-3635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
REALTY COUNSELING COMPANY, WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
In re: Samuel Opara
as 13-3323
Petitioner:
In re: SAMUEL OPARA
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FORT DIX FCI, DONNA ZICKEFOOSE and others
Nominal Respondent:
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
JOHNSON v. FORT DIX FCI et al
as 1:2012cv00162
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK JOHNSON
Defendant:
FORT DIX FCI, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Frederick Banks v. Sager, et al
as 11-2153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
SAGER, Ft. Dix, R & D Officer, R&D DEPT, FORT DIX FCI and others
Jeffrey Edmunds v. Donna Zickefoose, et al
as 11-1891
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY LEE EDMUNDS
Defendant - Appellee:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE, d/b/a DONNA ZICKEFOOSE a/k/a WARDEN, FORT DIX FCI and HARLEY G. LAPPIN, d/b/a HARLEY LAPPIN a/k/a DIRECTOR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
PODHORN v. FORT DIX FCI
as 1:2009cv04479
Petitioner:
PAUL E. PODHORN, JR.
Respondent:
FORT DIX FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
