Cases 121 - 130 of 202
Tragale v. Cox et al
as 3:2013cv00233
Defendant:
Robert B. Bannister, James G. Cox, Jack Palmer and others
Plaintiff:
Philip Tragale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vela v. Cox et al
as 3:2013cv00227
Defendant:
R. Bannister, James G. Cox, c/o Molina and others
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Vela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kapetan v. Cox
as 3:2013cv00171
Defendant:
Cheryl Burson, James G. Cox, Jennifer Dutton and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kapetan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leavitt v. Wickham et al
as 2:2013cv00490
Defendant:
L.C. Adams, Isidro Baca, R. Bannister and others
Plaintiff:
Cody Leavitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fox v. Neven et al
as 2:2013cv00438
Defendant:
James G. Cox, Cole Morrow and D. Neven
Plaintiff:
Derek Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Christensen v. Cox
as 3:2013cv00085
Defendant:
Ecedro Bacca, James G. Cox, E.K. McDaniels and others
Plaintiff:
Derek Christensen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munoz v. Coxs et al
as 3:2013cv00018
Respondent:
Isidro Baca, James G. Coxs, Nevada Attorney General and others
Petitioner:
Peter J. Munoz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthews v. Aranas et al
as 2:2013cv00051
Defendant:
Eric Anderson, Romeo Aranas, I. Baca and others
Plaintiff:
Felton L. Matthews, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Sandavol et al
as 2:2012cv02171
Defendant:
Cheryl Burson, James G. Cox, Frank Dreesen and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Duran Mack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Cox et al
as 2:2012cv02177
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Mary A. Boni, B. Connett and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
