Cases 121 - 130 of 6,016
Penland v. Flowers et al
as 2:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
Alex Penland
Defendant:
Lieutenant Flowers, Matthew Johnson, Zachary Gould and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton et al v. Winn et al
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Logan Burton, Marc Zdrojewski, James Wright and others
Defendant:
Cody Clay Winn, Market Modern, LLC and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00765
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Banks v. Doe et al.
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Banks, III
Defendant:
Scott John Doe, Jane Doe Williams and Jane Doe Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnes et al v. Lambert et al
as 2:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Raquel Barnes and Curtis Barnes
Defendant:
Carla Lambert, John Lambert and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Monachino v. Village of Walton Hills Police Dept et al.
as 1:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
Nicholas A. Monachino
Defendant:
Village of Walton Hills Police Dept, Calvin J. Schmidt and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
