Cases 121 - 130 of 262
Cooley et al v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2017cv03117
Plaintiff:
Brian Cooley, Robert Loveland and Edwin Rodriguez
Defendant:
John R Baldwin, Jeff Korte, Wexford Medical Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farrow Jr v. Champaign County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv02086
Plaintiff:
Paul Raymond Farrow Jr
Defendant:
Champaign County Sheriff's Office, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Butler et al
as 3:2017cv00366
Plaintiff:
Jerel Matthews
Defendant:
Kim Butler, Dr. Trost, Gail Walls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanks v. Doe et al
as 3:2017cv00330
Plaintiff:
Sean Hanks
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John or Jane Doe, Charles Heck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nally v. Dekalb County, Illinois et al
as 3:2017cv50078
Plaintiff:
William Nally, Jr.
Defendant:
DeKalb County, Illinois, Ronald Matekaitis, Rick Amato and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luczak v. Pfister et al
as 1:2017cv01983
Plaintiff:
Theodore Luczak
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, Leslie McCarthy, Graves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooley et al v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2017cv01834
Plaintiff:
Brian Cooley, Herman L Nitz, Jr, Robert Loveland and others
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, Jeff Korte, Wexford Medical Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryburn v. Williams et al
as 1:2017cv01757
Plaintiff:
Thomas V. Ryburn
Defendant:
Tarry Williams, Salim Obaisi, Boswrll Pharmacy Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sroga v. Williams et al
as 1:2017cv01333
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sroga
Defendant:
Charles Williams, Steve Sorfleet, Robert Dyckman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Copher v. Rankin et al
as 4:2017cv04039
Plaintiff:
Carl Copher
Defendant:
. Rankin, . Jepsen, East Moline Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
