Cases 121 - 130 of 141
Bowker v. Bakeman et al
as 1:2009cv00846
Plaintiff:
Erik S. Bowker
Defendant:
Ronald Bakeman, Deane Hassman, Gordon Friedman and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Rite Track Equipment Services, Inc. v. Unique Engineering and Consulting Services, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00109
Plaintiff:
Rite Track Equipment Services, Inc. and Rite Track Equipment Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Unique Engineering and Consulting Services, LLC, Jeff Gallant and Henry Knight
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Knight v. J.I.T. Packaging, Inc.
as 4:2008cv02545
Plaintiff:
Charles L Knight
Defendant:
J.I.T. Packaging, Inc. and J.I.T. Packaging, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Knight v. Gunja
as 4:2008cv01920
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Knight
Respondent:
Warden Gunja
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cella v. Knight-Cella
as 3:2008cv01590
Petitioner:
Giangiuseppe Cella
Respondent:
Amanda Danielle Knight-Cella
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Knight v. Warden Gunja
as 4:2008cv00637
Petitioner:
Maurice Knight
Respondent:
Warden Gunja
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Knight v. Arcos Industries, LLC et al
as 1:2008wf17012
Defendant:
Arcos Industries, LLC, BOC Group, Inc., ESAB Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gordie Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ames et al v. Robert Bosch Corporation
as 1:2007cv03426
Plaintiff:
Richard Ames, Ron Francisco, Bruce Rinehart and others
Defendant:
Robert Bosch Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Becker v. Ohio Attorney General et al
as 5:2007cv02928
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Ohio Attorney General, Marc Dann, J. Petro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
