Cases 121 - 130 of 155
Ruby Robinson Co. Inc. v. Ortiz Produce, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv09322
Plaintiff:
Ruby Robinson Co. Inc.
Defendant:
Ortiz Produce, Inc., Jose Luis Ortiz and Anais Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
USA v. Jorge Ortiz-Esquivel
as 12-41246
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE LUIS ORTIZ-ESQUIVEL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv07444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Ortiz-Espinosa et al v. BBVA Securities of Puerto Rico, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01608
Plaintiff:
Luis Ortiz-Espinosa , Maritza Soto-Garcia , Conjugal Partnership Ortiz-Soto and others
Defendant:
BBVA Securities of Puerto Rico, Inc. and Rafael Rodriguez-Abella
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv01133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Ortiz v. Aircraft Service International Group et al
as 1:2012cv03233
Defendant:
Aircraft Service International Group and BBA Aviation PLC
Plaintiff:
Luis Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02403
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
USA v. Jose Ortiz-Beltran
as 11-41322
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS ORTIZ-BELTRAN
USA v. Juan Valdez-Roble
as 11-10395
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN PEDRO VALDEZ-ROBLES, AKA Jose Luis Ortiz-Hernandez
CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Ortiz-Ortiz et al
as 3:2011cv01541
Plaintiff:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Defendant:
Jorge Luis Ortiz-Ortiz, Nydia Esther Gonzalez-Rodriguez and Conjugal Partnership Ortiz-Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
