Cases 121 - 130 of 185
MURPHY v. U.S. MARSHALS
as 1:2016cv01949
Plaintiff:
VALERIE MURPHY
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
MURPHY v. USA
as 1:2016cv01220
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
EDWARD MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BARKSDALE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv01120
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT BARKSDALE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STUART F. DELERY, JOHN D. BATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
AMERICAN EXPLORATION & MINING ASSOCIATION v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2016cv00737
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN EXPLORATION & MINING ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR , SALLY JEWELL , JANICE SCHNEIDER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
RAY v. MURPHY
as 1:2016cv00726
Plaintiff:
RAY and GEOFFREY D. RAY
Defendant:
MURPHY and PATRICK J. MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS NATIONAL 401(k) SAVINGS PLAN et al v. FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC.
as 1:2016cv00657
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS NATIONAL 401(k) SAVINGS PLAN , JOHN MURPHY and TOM VENTURA
Defendant:
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
SINGH et al v. MCCONVILLE et al
as 1:2016cv00581
Plaintiff:
KANWAR BIR SINGH , HARPAL SINGH and SATWINDER SINGH
Defendant:
JAMES C. MCCONVILLE , DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE , ASHTON B. CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCCAUGHEY v. MURPHY
as 1:2016cv00563
Plaintiff:
WAYNE M. MCCAUGHEY
Defendant:
PATRICK J. MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
