Cases 121 - 130 of 326
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Weems v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County
as 3:2017cv01072
Plaintiff:
Penny Weems
Defendant:
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Beckett v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County et al
as 3:2017cv00937
Plaintiff:
Brandy Beckett
Defendant:
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County , Taffy Marsh and Craig S. Ott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Holley et al
as 3:2017cv00890
Plaintiff:
Robert King
Defendant:
Keith Holley and Metropolitan Government of Nashville-Davidson County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bennett v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County
as 3:2017cv00630
Plaintiff:
Danyelle E. Bennett
Defendant:
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cantino v. The Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2017cv00499
Plaintiff:
Justin S. Cantino
Defendant:
The Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee , Douglas L. Smith , Richard Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
