Cases 121 - 130 of 198
Trafton v. Koplove et al
as 1:2014cv00155
Defendant:
H. Michael Koplove and Lynda A. Koplove
Plaintiff:
Wayne Scott Trafton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Title
Chalifoux v. Chalifoux et al
as 1:2014cv00136
Defendant:
Gail E. Bakis, Mark Borque, Jennifer M. Chalifoux and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph W. Chalifoux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Barry et al v. Meat House Franchising, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00033
Plaintiff:
Edward R. Barry, William Kenney, Scott J. Nathan and others
Defendant:
Centrix Bank & Trust, Trustee, J&J Investments, LLC and Meat House Franchising, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Morin v. Credit Bureau Collection Services, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00008
Defendant:
Credit Bureau Collection Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Scott Morin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Widi v. Strafford County et al
as 1:2013cv00536
Defendant:
Raymond Bower, Scott Chabot, Warren Dowaliby and others
Plaintiff:
David J. Widi, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Marshall v. US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner
as 1:2013cv00363
Plaintiff:
Scott Marshall
Notice Only:
US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only)
Defendant:
US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rogers v. New Hampshire, State of
as 1:2013fp00322
Notice Only:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - HC (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - HC (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
New Hampshire, State of
Petitioner:
Scott N. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mabardy v. Sanders et al
as 1:2013cv00341
Defendant:
Cheryll-Ann Andrews, Scott Cain, John/Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
David Mabardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
