Cases 121 - 130 of 1,062
Tejeda v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv00947
Plaintiff:
Merli Tejeda
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Randy Harmon, Jr. v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv00921
Plaintiff:
Randy Harmon, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Occupant(s) of 303 Treetrail Pkwy Norcross, GA 30093 v. Unknown
as 1:2023mi00008
Plaintiff:
Occupant(s) of 303 Treetrail Pkwy Norcross, GA 30093
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Simmonds v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv00912
Plaintiff:
Norman Simmonds
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox, Chief Deputy Randy Akies, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Watson et al
as 1:2023cv00864
Plaintiff:
Tony James, Jr.
Defendant:
Special Agent Alfred A. Watson, Special Agent Jorge Miyar, Lionel S. Lofton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Casleberry v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv00808
Plaintiff:
Lamar Casleberry
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson, III v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Julius Thompson, III
Defendant:
Unknown, Veronica Stewart, Ricky Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SOLESBEE v. CHRIS
as 1:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
JASON CLEVELAND SOLESBEE
Defendant:
CHRIS and UNKNOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson, III v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv00628
Plaintiff:
Julius Thompson and Julius Thompson, III
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Fayette County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Alfonso Harmon
Defendant:
Fayette County Sheriff Office, Fayette County Jail, Deputy Chief Anthony Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
