Cases 121 - 130 of 2,133
BURTCH v. DAVIS
as 3:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
CURTIS DEAN BURTCH, JR
Defendant:
TARA DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davies v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05078
Plaintiff:
Susan Davies
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Professional Solutions Insurance Company v. Chappuis et al
as 1:2023cv05037
Plaintiff:
Professional Solutions Insurance Company
Defendant:
James L. Chappuis, M.D., James L. Chappuis, M.D., P.C., Atlanta Orthopaedic Surgery Center, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Alto Assett Company 4, LLC v. Davis
as 1:2023cv04948
Plaintiff:
Alto Assett Company 4, LLC
Defendant:
Lakaii Davis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Davis v. Whittaker
as 1:2023cv04916
Plaintiff:
Namon Davis
Defendant:
Clayton Whittaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv04800
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer USA, Bayer U.S. LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Christian Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Simon et al v. Davis
as 4:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Nicho Andropolis Simon and Adrian Leandrew Carter
Defendant:
Brian Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. ROCKET MORTGAGE LLC et al
as 7:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
MARGARET DAVIS
Defendant:
ROCKET MORTGAGE LLC and MCCALLA RAYMER LEIBERT PIERCE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Davis v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv04467
Petitioner:
Terrell Davis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
