Civil Rights Cases filed in Oregon
Cases 121 - 130 of 7,562
Granville v. Beaverton Police Dept. et al
as 3:2024cv00213
Plaintiff: Davonne Granville
Defendant: Beaverton Police Dept., Officer Erik Faulkner and Washington County Sheriffs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00218
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00217
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Ellis v. City of Corvallis
as 6:2024cv00205
Plaintiff: Charlyn Ellis
Defendant: City of Corvallis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00199
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Pinski v. City of Philomath et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff: Cynthia Pinski
Defendant: City of Philomath, Blake Bowers, City of Corvallis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2024cv00168
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans With Disabilities Act
Christensen v. Curry County et al
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff: Richard Christensen
Defendant: Curry County, Brad Alcorn, Chris Paasch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bivins v. Biden et al
as 3:2024cv00158
Petitioner: Michael E. Bivins
Defendant: Joe Biden and State of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?