Cases 121 - 130 of 16,135
Factory Mutual Insurance Company v. Vencomatic, Inc
as 8:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Factory Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Vencomatic, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Cerros v. Fannon
as 8:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Joel A. Cerros
Respondent:
Steve Fannon
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Beckman v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Devon Beckman
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Carodine v. Cass County Department of Corrections
as 8:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Robert Carodine
Defendant:
Cass County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lapteva v. MILLER et al
as 4:2024cv03042
Plaintiff:
Elena Stanislavovn Lapteva
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Neemann v. USA
as 8:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Gregory Neemann
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McCray v. State of Nebraska
as 4:2024cv03040
Petitioner:
Colby I. McCray
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franke v. Jeffreys
as 8:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Pernell M. Franke
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
