Cases 121 - 130 of 88,643
Vallier v. Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv02253
Plaintiff:
Raymond Vallier
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Stepanoff et al v. Bite Ninja, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02252
Plaintiff:
Theodore Stepanoff, Bradley McKinney, Ryan P. Cooper and others
Defendant:
Bite Ninja, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 dd Examination and treatment for emergency medical conditions and women in labor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Liles v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Dustin Liles
Defendant:
Governor Bill Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rollins v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
Steve Rollins
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ervin v. Barnes et al
as 3:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Jackie Darrell Ervin
Defendant:
Brandon Barnes, Jamison Marriman, Dillian Seibers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wall v. Koellien
as 3:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
James Brent Wall
Defendant:
Deputy f/n/u Koellien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black River Entertainment LLC et al v. Ewing
as 3:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
Black River Entertainment LLC, Kelsea Ballerini and Alysa Vanderheym
Defendant:
Bo Ewing
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
