Cases 121 - 130 of 12,233
THC-Orange County, LLC v. Regence Blueshield of Idaho, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
THC-Orange County, LLC doing business as Kindred Hospital-Ontario
Defendant:
Regence Blueshield of Idaho, Inc., Cambia Health Solutions, Inc., Winco Holding, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Tew v. Smith Roofing LLC, et al.
as 4:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Thommas Tew
Defendant:
Smith Roofing LLC, Crum & Foster Specialty and Old Republic Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Signatours Corporation v. Callender
as 1:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Signatours Corporation
Defendant:
Wayne Callender
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Mulinix v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Kendra Michaela Mulinix
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Wintrode v. Twin Falls County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Joshwa Aaron Wintrode
Defendant:
Twin Falls County Jail, Twin Falls County Sheriff and Tom Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Anaya
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Davis Davis
Defendant:
C/O Anaya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Sara Morrill Olson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Qualman v. Thorne
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Treg Qualman
Defendant:
Jodi L. Thorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
