Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in North Dakota
Cases 121 - 130 of 1,229
Landis v. Krabbenhoft We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00094
Petitioner: Douglas E. Landis
Respondent: David Krabbenhoft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stiles v. USA
as 3:2022cv00115
Petitioner: Robert Carlton Stiles
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mitchell v. USA
as 3:2022cv00113
Petitioner: Lornell Centrell Mitchell
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Thomas v. Sayler We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00081
Petitioner: Allen Charles Thomas
Respondent: Warden James Sayler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garmoo v. USA
as 1:2022cv00107
Petitioner: Mario R. Garmoo
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Gomes v. USA
as 3:2022cv00102
Petitioner: Anthony Santos Gomes
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Azure v. USA
as 3:2022cv00098
Petitioner: Myron Jay Azure
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Schuh v. Balaban et al
as 1:2022cv00072
Plaintiff: Ricky R. Schuh
Defendant: Steven Balaban and Tessa M. Vaagen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parizek v. Hurly We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00058
Petitioner: Scott Ramon Parizek
Respondent: Michael P Hurly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaw v. N.D.S.P. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00047
Petitioner: Delvin Lamont Shaw
Respondent: N.D.S.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?