Cases 121 - 130 of 153,872
Bonilla v. Freeman et al
as 4:2024cv02741
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Beth Labson Freeman and Judge Howard R. Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garner v. SVSP Warden et al
as 3:2024cv02751
Plaintiff:
Randall James Garner
Defendant:
SVSP Warden and C/O M. Avila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Macias et al
as 4:2024cv02725
Plaintiff:
Avaro Covarrubias Perez
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Macias, Correctional Officer L.Lopez, C. Koening and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Clay et al
as 4:2024cv02739
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Jennie Clay, Patty Tyler and Monique
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Hero Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2024mc80107
Defendant:
Hero Labs, Inc. and Vishal Shah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Sun v. Wu et al
as 3:2024cv02747
Plaintiff:
Zhi Sun
Defendant:
Yiqi Wu and Aimerce Inc
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
U.A. Local 393 Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Cool Tech Mechanical, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02762
Plaintiff:
U.A. Local 393 Health and Welfare Trust Fund, U.A. Local 393 Pension Fund, ERIC MUSSYNSKI and others
Defendant:
Cool Tech Mechanical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151 Labor: Review of Agency Action
TP-Link USA Corporation v. Netgear, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02754
Plaintiff:
TP-Link USA Corporation
Defendant:
Netgear, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Gilbert v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv02735
Plaintiff:
Heather Marie Gilbert
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
North v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv02732
Plaintiff:
Anthony Keith North
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
