Cases 121 - 130 of 252
Rannow v. McLeod County Court et al
as 0:2019cv02745
Plaintiff:
Steven Rannow
Defendant:
McLeod County Social Services and McLeod County Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. McMillen et al
as 0:2019cv02880
Defendant:
Marsha McMillen and Barbara J Harrington
Plaintiff:
Roger Jerome Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jannetta et al v. Minnesota Dept. of Human Services et al
as 0:2019cv02622
Plaintiff:
Merlin Adolphson, Kenneth Daywitt, Steven Hogy and others
Defendant:
Jannine Hebert, MSOP Media Review Committee Personnel Jane Doe 1-5 John Doe 1-5, Nicole Elsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daywitt v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2019cv02632
Defendant:
Justin Joslin, Brian Ninneman, Ryan Fahland and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth S. Daywitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services, The et al
as 0:2019cv02811
Defendant:
Nathan John Madsen, Jesse D. Berglund, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the and others
Plaintiff:
Hollis J. Larson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Johnston et al
as 0:2019cv02597
Plaintiff:
Ricky Mason
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston, Blake Carey, Jim Berg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Asher v. Harpstad et al
as 0:2019cv02381
Defendant:
Jody Harpstad, Kevin Moser, Andrea Kosloski and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy David Asher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spartz v. TeBrake et al
as 0:2019cv02739
Defendant:
Malinda Henderson, Blair Nyline, Dr. Shelia Brandt and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen George Spartz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blair-Hanson v. Johnson et al
as 0:2019cv02195
Defendant:
Jensina Rosen, Susan Johnson and Aaron Engleson
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Blair-Hanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Johnston et al
as 0:2019cv02523
Defendant:
Brian Ninneman, Katie McDowell, Peter Puffer and others
Plaintiff:
David Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
