Cases 121 - 130 of 93,710
Smith v. Owens et al
as 7:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Smith
Defendant:
R. Owens, B. Dotson, T. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caruthers v. Rockingham Regional Jail Medical Department et al
as 7:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
William H. Caruthers
Defendant:
Rockingham Regional Jail Medical Department, Officer Perez, Officer Morbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Foot Levelers, Inc. v. Maggs
as 7:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Foot Levelers, Inc.
Defendant:
Tim Maggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
DM Transportation Management Services, Inc. v. All Stars Premium Sportswear, LLC
as 2:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
DM Transportation Management Services, Inc.
Defendant:
All Stars Premium Sportswear, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bhandari et al
as 1:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Sanjay Bhandari, Vinod Singhi and Rakesh Jain
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Manougian v. Calixte et al
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Ara Manougian
Defendant:
Hans M. Calixte and Lolo Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Salahuddin v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00146
Petitioner:
Khalil A. Salahuddin
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall v. Physicians to Women Inc.
as 7:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Janet Hall
Defendant:
Physicians to Women Inc. and Physicians to Women, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
