Cases 131 - 140 of 1,981
Lopez v. Derr
as 1:2022cv00318
Petitioner:
Mauricio Javier Alvarez Lopez
Respondent:
Estela Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lopez-Urquiza v. Derr
as 1:2022cv00301
Petitioner:
Leonel Lopez-Urquiza
Respondent:
Estela Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kapoi v. USA
as 1:2022cv00290
Petitioner:
Samuel K. Kapoi
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Harris v. USA
as 1:2022cv00245
Petitioner:
Sheila Harris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Perez v. Derr
as 1:2022cv00241
Plaintiff:
Frankie Emillian Perez
Defendant:
Estela Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Marler v. Derr
as 1:2022cv00240
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Marler
Respondent:
Estela Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Eblacas v. Department of Public Safety (DPS) et al
as 1:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Dayson James Eblacas
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety (DPS), Halawa Correctional Facility Medical Unit and Dr. Deane Hatakeyama
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Opunui v. Robl et al
as 1:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
Patrick Opunui, Jr.
Defendant:
Kris Robl, Mr. Sua and Mr. Blaisedell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Opunui, Jr. v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Patrick Opunui, Jr.
Defendant:
Estela Derr, Dr. Nathan Kwon and Dwayne Bautista
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Yanagihara v. Derr
as 1:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
Chaes Yanagihara
Defendant:
Estela Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
