Cases 131 - 140 of 351
Blackmore v. Potamkin et al
as 1:2019cv02617
Defendant:
Alan Potamkin, Andi Potamkin and Andi Potamkin Blackmore
Plaintiff:
William Jordan Blackmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lloyd et al v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2011cv09305
Plaintiff:
Orzalla Sulaimankhil, Linn M. Gilmore, Luis Delgado and others
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co., J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. and others
Petitioner:
Mark O. Vandevelde
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03891
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Cruz et al v. Kinjo, Inc et al
as 1:2019cv02085
Plaintiff:
Manuel Cruz and Fernando Perez
Defendant:
Andy Lau, Raymond [LNU] and Kinjo, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinson et al v. New York City Transit Authority et al
as 1:2019cv01404
Defendant:
Andy Byford, New York City Transit Authority and Fernando Ferrer
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Robinson and David Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp
De Los Santos et al v. Lau & Cheung LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01685
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Rodriguez and Rodrigo De Los Santos
Defendant:
Andy Lau, Karen Ng, Lau & Cheung LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00894
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01428
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01345
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
