Cases 131 - 140 of 298
Scates v. Doe et al
as 6:2015cv02904
Plaintiff:
David M Scates
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chestnut v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2015cv02770
Petitioner:
Raymond Edward Chestnut
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Boyd v. US Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 6:2015cv02108
Plaintiff:
James I Boyd
Defendant:
US Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcon v. Cruz et al
as 6:2015cv01480
Plaintiff:
Julien Garcon
Defendant:
Warden Cruz, Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, David D Palmatier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurst v. Thomas et al
as 4:2014cv04725
Petitioner:
James L Hurst
Respondent:
L R Thomas, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Marshal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ward v. United States of America et al
as 0:2014cv04762
Plaintiff:
Larry Ward
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goist v. United States of America
as 9:2014cv04036
Plaintiff:
Paul B Goist
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serrano-Correa v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 9:2014cv02993
Plaintiff:
Victor Serrano-Correa
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serrano-Correa v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 8:2014cv02993
Plaintiff:
Victor Serrano-Correa
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Deitemeyer v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 4:2014cv02855
Petitioner:
Luke Deitemeyer
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
