Cases 131 - 140 of 221
Parker #33398 v. Wexford Health Sources Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv00388
Plaintiff:
Rodger Parker
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Incorporated, Caron Grant, JH Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Chapman Bell Road Imports LLC
as 2:2014cv00143
Plaintiff:
Ted King
Defendant:
Chapman Bell Road Imports LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Scott v. Janice et al
as 2:2014cv00122
Plaintiff:
Calvin Ray Scott
Defendant:
Unknown Janice, Unknown Bell and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Bell et al
as 2:2013cv02374
Defendant:
Thomas Bell and Wexford Health Sources Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Leo M Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laprada v. Bell et al
as 2:2013cv02298
Defendant:
Thomas Bell, Richard Pratt, Jo Ann Badders and others
Plaintiff:
Gildardo Laprada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Knapp et al
as 2:2013mc00084
Plaintiff:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Defendant:
Moyenda M Knapp , Juanita B Rodriguez and Johnson & Bell Limited
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Otteson #181064 v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2013cv01793
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joseph Otteson
Defendant:
Unknown Party, Arizona Department of Corrections, Unknown Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haves #162876 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv01559
Plaintiff:
Eric Dusty Haves
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Caron Grant, Nick C Salyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merrick v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv01544
Plaintiff:
JD Merrick
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Wexford Health Sources, Diamond Pharmacy Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Thunderbird Collection Specialists Incorporated
as 2:2013cv01532
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Bell
Defendant:
Thunderbird Collection Specialists Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
