Cases 131 - 140 of 1,743
Demos v. Bayer et al
as 2:2023cv00772
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Daniel Bayer, Jennifer Adams, M Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv00768
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr, District of Columbia, The Virginia Corporation and others
Defendant:
United States of America, The 3 Branches of Government, United States Congress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Demos, Jr. v. Clerk of the Court, et al
as 23-35342
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
CLERK OF THE COURT and OFFICERS AND JUDGES OF THE STATE SUPREME COURT
John Demos, Jr. v. United States District Court
as 23-35343
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Roberts et al v. Citation Oil & Gas Corporation
as 5:2023cv00413
Plaintiff:
John Roberts and Misty Roberts
Defendant:
Citation Oil & Gas Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Philip Petrone, et al v. Werner Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 23-1884
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Philip Petrone, Stewart Fisher, Jasbir Singh and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Werner Enterprises, Inc., doing business as Werner Trucking and Drivers Management, LLC
Philip Petrone, et al v. Werner Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 23-1886
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Philip Petrone, Stewart Fisher, Jasbir Singh and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Werner Enterprises, Inc., doing business as Werner Trucking and Drivers Management, LLC
Wells v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Oregon Department of Corrections, DSG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John DavisIn re: John Davis
as 23-1380
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN ROBERT DAVIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
