Cases 131 - 140 of 890
Hoyt v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2020cv00865
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hoyt
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc, Michael Jack, Tammy Hendrickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sonnier v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2020cv00851
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc, Tammy Hendrickson, Darryl Vannoy and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Sonnier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2020cv00862
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Wilson
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc, John Doe, Sheryl Renatza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Comeaux v. Vannoy
as 20-30794
Respondent / Appellee:
Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary and James M. LeBlanc, Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
Adam Comeaux
Washington v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2020cv00840
Plaintiff:
Vernon Washington
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc, Michael Jack, Tammy Hendrickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Rheams et al
as 3:2020cv00814
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc, Brent Thompson, Joseph F.G. Lamartiniere and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Savage v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2020cv00811
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc, Shirley Coody, Tim Delaney and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Savage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marlowe v. LeBlanc
as 20-30738
Defendant / Appellant:
Jonathan Travis, Chermaine Brown, Sergeant, James M. LeBlanc, Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Christopher Marlowe
Gordon v. Louisiana Department Of Public Safety and Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00810
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc, Director of Board of Ethics, Ann Marie Easley and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. LeBlanc
as 5:2020cv01491
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc
Plaintiff:
Jessie R Williams and Jessie Ray Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
