Cases 131 - 140 of 1,606
Toles v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2017cv02447
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Plaintiff:
Jamond Antwain Toles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fernandez-Salazar v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2017cv02346
Plaintiff:
Julio Cesar Fernandez-Salazar
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Paul Penzone, Fulton Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Molina v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv02371
Plaintiff:
Arthur Molina
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Varela v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv02347
Plaintiff:
Ray Anthony Varela
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Page v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv02372
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thomas Nelson Page
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed #182327 v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Food Factory et al
as 2:2017cv02334
Plaintiff:
Allen Reed
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Food Factory, Joseph M Arpaio, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Topa v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2017cv02134
Plaintiff:
Andrew S Topa
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Donald Stapley, Andrew Kunsek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv02120
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Joseph M Arpaio and Durango Jail
Plaintiff:
Eric Richard Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Montgomery et al
as 2:2017cv02039
Plaintiff:
Willie E Thomas
Defendant:
William G Montgomery, Jennifer N Carper, Maricopa County Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Penzone et al
as 2:2017cv01946
Plaintiff:
John Leo Davis
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Joseph M Arpaio, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
